Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zach Arnold's avatar

Even with AI misspellings, this is exactly the kind of purpose it can and should be used for: comedy and parody.

Tony Loiseleur's avatar

Is it me or is the Long-Term Debt Snapshot graph a bit hard to read? (I.e., who at Fortune thought it was a good idea to make all their lines shades of red or orange? Makes disambiguation of whose line is who's a bit difficult.)

Anyway, while I'm not surprised they're going to outside funding to bankroll this silly purchase of WB, I am personally worried about what that foreign ownership will mean for popular franchises like DC Comics and Star Trek (which, admittedly, is from the Paramount side). Even with non-voting shares, does that give these Petrostates leverage over editorial direction? Will Star Trek suddenly shift from being telling stories about a socialistic utopian future in favor of more vapid JJ Abrams-style whiz-bang scifi adventure if the Ellisons or the PIF say it should? Does Superman stop standing up for oppressed people suffering under an authoritarian tyrant's invasion of their state like he did in his latest film?

Gamers are already quite split on the involvement of states like KSA in buying major esports leagues/events and game developers. Sure, their griping hasn't stopped them from continuing to patronize these products (yet--but really, what alternative do they have?), but gamers, a large portion of which have been traditionally apolitical mostly due to apathy, are starting to speak in anxious tones about what states like KSA suddenly swallowing up large swathes of their pastime means for their future. The last thing any of us want to worry about now is that it goes *beyond* our narrow interests, because it feels like this is suddenly happening everywhere and in almost every medium.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?