Inside the UFC's Gambling & Integrity Crisis

How a night in Las Vegas could turn into a federal investigation that could shake the foundation of the UFC.

Opening Scene

Las Vegas — November 1, 2025, a featherweight bout at the UFC APEX between Isaac Dulgarian and Yadier del Valle seemed routine on the surface. But beneath the lights of the Octagon, something unraveled fast: early odds had Dulgarian as a heavy favorite at –250, then, just hours before the bell, the line tightened dramatically. Sportsbooks pulled prop bets. Some refunded losing wagers. The fight proceeded anyway… and Dulgarian was submitted in under four minutes.

That entire sequence triggered a question that will haunt the UFC if the facts hold: Who knew what… and when?

The Warning That Arrived Too Late

According to multiple industry sources, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and IC 360 had already notified the UFC of unusual betting activity tied to the Dulgarian fight. Independent reporter Harry Mac reported that federal regulators flagged over 100 UFC fights this year for similar irregularities. The Dulgarian bout became the breaking point.

Whether the alert reached the UFC directly or through a state intermediary remains under review, but one fact seems undeniable: the promotion was warned and chose to let the fight continue.

As the legendary boxing writer Bert Sugar once said:

“History doesn’t repeat itself, but in this sport, it rhymes louder than anywhere else.”

The echoes are unmistakable. The same state where casino bosses once turned a blind eye to crooked tables may now be watching another empire gamble with its own legitimacy.

The Men Responsible… For Now

Two names sit at the center of this storm: Marc Ratner and Jeff Novitzky.

Ratner, the UFC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, is a Nevada institution. He spent decades inside the state’s athletic commission system: the very body once tasked with cleaning up the mob influence that stained boxing. If the integrity alert came through, it would have landed in Ratner’s department. Investigators will want to know: What did you do when the warning arrived?

Novitzky is the UFC Senior Vice President of Athlete Health and Performance. He was given this job promotion in 2019, as noted in this UFC press release.

Prior to joining UFC, Novitzky was a federal agent for the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), leading investigations into companies suspected of illegal distribution of dietary supplements and designer steroids. Before the FDA, Novitzky was a special agent for the Internal Revenue Service in their Criminal Investigation Department, where he oversaw and investigated some of the highest-profile performance enhancing drug cases in professional sports, including those involving Barry Bonds, Lance Armstrong and Marion Jones.

Now as an UFC’s executive, he oversees athlete safety and compliance initiatives, including the organization’s anti-doping partnerships. His role has historically intersected with matters of integrity and regulatory compliance, particularly during prior controversies such as the James Krause betting scandal.

As the FBI expands its review, investigators are expected to examine how integrity alerts are handled within the UFC’s broader compliance structure: a system Novitzky has helped shape, though it remains unclear how directly he was involved in this particular case.

Ariel Helwani reported that fighters privately admitted to being approached multiple times about fixing fights. If those accounts are verified, both executives will be questioned about why no visible intervention followed.

They were supposed to be the guardians of integrity. Now they’re the ones under the microscope.

A Pattern Written in the Odds

This isn’t new territory. In November 2022, the Darrick Minner vs. Shayilan Nuerdanbieke fight triggered an investigation after dramatic betting swings and in-fight behavior pointed to a fix. The fallout was swift: coach James Krause was banned, fighters associated with him were suspended, and sportsbooks temporarily froze UFC betting lines.

At the time, Dana White told reporters, “You mess with the integrity of this sport, you’re done.”

Yet three years later, over a reportedly hundred fights flagged for anomalies, the alarms are ringing again. Harry Mac’s report drew attention to the scale, and White later disputed the figure in an interview with TMZ. But the dispute doesn’t erase the data or the optics that… the fight still went on.

A Fight That Was Never Just a Fight

The Dulgarian bout had all the hallmarks of potential manipulation:

• Dulgarian opened at -250 and dropped to -160 just hours before the fight.

• Prop bets for first-round finishes were pulled from multiple sportsbooks.

• Refunds were issued after the fight ended.

• Dulgarian was released from his UFC contract within 24 hours.

Then came the quiet bombshell. Former UFC fighters like Lando Vannata joked publicly that he had been approached seven times to throw a fight. “My record reflects my integrity,” he wrote. Also, Vanessa Demopoulos admits to receiving similar “overtures” before taking down her statement as well.

The whispers aren’t whispers anymore. They’re evidence waiting for validation.

The Bureau Moving In

Behind the scenes, two sources confirm the FBI’s Sports Integrity Task Force has been tracking suspicious betting activity in combat sports since 2021, years before the Krause scandal broke the surface. What started as a few isolated cases will evolve into a full-scale federal audit.

Agents will now comb through every layer of the UFC ecosystem, referees, judges, matchmakers, and managers, to determine whether any non-fighter personnel may have benefited from manipulated outcomes.

Over the next six months, the Bureau will issue subpoenas for sportsbook data, commission correspondence, and UFC internal communications. Investigators will cross-reference referee assignments with line movements, studying whether officiating decisions consistently align with betting anomalies.

Managers such as Jason House and his Iridium Sports Agency, tied to fighters under scrutiny, are being questioned about connections to sportsbook manipulation, offshore books, and betting syndicates.

The Bureau’s goal is not to just prove a single fight was fixed. It will be to expose a potential system of negligence and profiteering that allowed manipulation to thrive in plain sight.

And if those findings link missed alerts or repeated internal oversights to profit collection, the FBI could classify it as reckless endangerment of regulated markets or facilitation of potential fraud… a move that would escalate this from a sports scandal into a federal case.

The Crossfire Between the Octagon and the Hardwood

To understand the intensity behind the Bureau’s renewed interest in the UFC, you have to look beyond the cage: to the NBA’s gambling storm that’s rattling professional sports since late summer.

When news broke that multiple NBA players and coaches were under federal review for alleged betting and gambling violations, the NBA faced a credibility crisis. The public questioned how the FBI, the Department of Justice, the NBA, and state gaming regulators could allow insider wagering to carelessly seep into the multi-billion-dollar league.

Enter Kash Patel, the newly appointed FBI Director: a man fighting fires on every front. His tenure has been marred by internal shakeups, whistleblower complaints, and mounting criticism of his perceived leniency toward white-collar investigations.

Now, Patel is under pressure to show strength. That’s why this UFC case matters. It’s not just about a fight or victory. It’s about optics, control, and narrative.

The FBI needs a clean, decisive headline, and a public demonstration that it can still police America’s biggest cultural exports.

By tethering the UFC probe to the broader sports integrity crisis, Patel’s office is effectively positioning itself as the moral referee of an industry worth billions. The NBA’s scandal gave the Bureau political cover; the UFC’s potential negligence gives it teeth.

The Bureau isn’t targeting compliance by any means. It’ll really be looking for a scalp… something it can hold up to prove the system works. Only the devil himself could make a deal that would cushion everybody’s fall and let everybody walk away with a slap on the wrist.

So if that means tightening the vise around Marc Ratner and Jeff Novitzky, then it seems, so be it.

The Fallout That Could Follow

Here’s what happens next:

• Regulators will request the UFC produce communication logs, betting partner data, and internal escalation records.

• Ratner’s office will have to show documentation proving the alert was received and acted upon.

• Novitzky’s team will need to explain fighter reports, approach allegations, and their communication with integrity firms.

• The Nevada State Athletic Commission could potentially reopen licensing reviews for both executives. Ratner was a key figure in securing Nevada’s approval for TKO’s boxing license, which now adds another layer of scrutiny to his oversight role.

The most damning outcome would be evidence of repeated inaction. If multiple red flags were ignored while profits rolled in, the UFC could face massive regulatory and financial consequences, and Ratner or Novitzky could become the faces of institutional failure.

But as the crosshairs tighten, another name will quietly surface in every conversation: Hunter Campbell. As the UFC’s Chief Business Officer and one of the few executives with authority parallel to Dana White, Campbell oversees everything from contracts to crisis management. When the Bureau and regulators start circling, the industry will inevitably look to him to absorb the blow.

Yet according to multiple sources, Campbell is heavily insulated, both legally and politically. His proximity to TKO’s executive structure and the backing of Endeavor’s top brass make it highly unlikely that he’ll face direct consequences, even if internal communication trails show he was aware of the alert.

In short, someone will have to take the fall. But the man most capable of surviving the collapse may already be standing behind reinforced glass.

Echoes of Old Vegas

Half a century ago, the Las Vegas fight scene operated on handshake deals, envelopes of cash, and unspoken rules. Mob fixers, promoters, and casino bosses all played their part in making sure the house always won. Decisions weren’t made in boardrooms; they were whispered in backrooms, over cigars and cocktails, where the difference between a champion and a nobody could be bought for the right price.

Today, the house is digital, and its odds are data-driven… but the playbook feels the same. The smoke has been replaced by screens, and the whispers by encrypted messages, but the objective hasn’t changed: control the outcome before it happens. In the old days, the mob used muscle to tilt the game. Now, it’s algorithms, syndicates, and insider data moving lines faster than a left hook.

The illusion of integrity is what keeps the lights on. Fans believe they’re watching competition; sportsbooks believe they’re managing risk. But behind the curtain, too many people seem to know the endings before the story’s written.

As one federal source put it, “When the line moves like that, someone already knows, or knew, the ending.”

It’s a haunting echo of the old Vegas ethos: the house doesn’t lose because it never plays fair. Only now, the stakes are global. Billions flow through digital sportsbooks, offshores, and exchanges every month. And if investigators prove that even a fraction of that ecosystem was manipulated, the fallout won’t just stain the UFC; it could shake the entire foundation of legalized sports betting.

Because when history rhymes this loudly, it’s not just coincidence…

Ultima Sententia: The House Never Loses

The UFC built its empire on the promise that it was everything boxing was not. Transparent. Disciplined. Regulated. It sold itself as the model of order in a sport long haunted by “chaos”. But when the alarms went off, when the integrity alert landed on the desks of Dana White, Hunter Campbell, Marc Ratner, and Jeff Novitzky… the fight went on anyway.

That decision changed everything. This is no longer a story about a rogue fighter or a suspicious betting line. It is a story about institutional consent. About what happens when the people entrusted to protect the sport choose to gamble with it instead.

The moment that alert was reviewed and ignored, the UFC stopped being a victim of circumstance and became an active participant in negligence. The correlation between James Krause and Isaac Dulgarian should have been grounds enough to flag the fight and cancel it. In the absence of any wrongdoing, the UFC should have been quick to respond to Harry’s allegations with a statement denying the claims. Instead, their silence until Dana’s TMZ appearance raises suspicions and implies that they may be hiding something.

“There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.”

― George W. Bush

Now the sportsbooks will want blood. Billions move through those odds every year, and if they believe their integrity was compromised, they will not quietly walk away. They will turn to regulators, federal agencies, and public scrutiny for retribution.

This is no longer a scandal confined to the Octagon. It is a crisis that runs through every vein of the industry. Bettors who lost faith. Brands that built trust. A Bureau that has been waiting years for this very opening.

If the Bureau’s findings and independent reports hold, this will not be remembered as one bad night in Las Vegas. It will be remembered as the moment the world’s largest combat sports organization was forced to confront its own reflection. Not as a victim of corruption, but as a company that saw the warning lights flashing and chose to keep driving.

Because in the end, the question isn’t who fixed the fight.

It’s who let it happen.

---

Follow @bobby_s_axelrod on X and @blakeavignon on IG and subscribe to The MMA Draw and The Axe Files for combat sports intel, business crossovers, and breakdowns the mainstream won’t touch.

Blake Avignon is the pseudonym of a strategist and media executive who has worked across the UFC, F1, MLB, NBA, and NFL: building brands, brokering partnerships, and reshaping the future of sports and entertainment from the inside.